Data for dissertations December 18, 2017

35467 Assessing Police Performance in Citizen Encounters, Schenectady and Syracuse, NY, 2011-2014

36052 Synthetic North Carolina Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) Data, 2009-2013

36098 St Louis County Hot Spots in Residential Areas (SCHIRA) 2011-2013

36244 Evaluation of the Defending Childhood Demonstration Program in Six States, 2004-2014

36669 Eurobarometer 84.2: E-Communications in the Household, Awareness and Perception of Europeans about EU Customs, Europeans, Agriculture and the Common Agricultural Policy, October 2015

36682 Afrobarometer Round 6: The Quality of Democracy and Governance in Egypt, 2015

36751 Afrobarometer Round 6: The Quality of Democracy and Governance in Swaziland, 2015

36828 National Crime Victimization Survey, 2016

36861 Early Head Start-Child Care Partnerships, 2016 [United States]

36864 Afrobarometer Round 6: The Quality of Democracy and Governance in South Africa, 2015

36868 Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA]: Release Measures – Scales, 2000-2010 [Restricted]

36031 Evaluation of the Shreveport, Louisiana Predictive Policing Programs, 2011-2012

36097 Evaluation of the Elder Abuse Decision Support System (EADSS) in Illinois, 2011-2014

36129 Evaluation of a Hot Spot Policing Field Experiment in St. Louis, 2012 – 2014

36348 Identifying Effective Counter-Trafficking Programs and Practices in the Unites States, 2003-2012

36446 A Multi-Method, Multi-Site Study of Gang Desistance, United States, 2012

36562 Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP), 2004-2015 [28 COUNTRIES]

36668 Eurobarometer 84.1: Parlemeter, September 2015

36677 The Prevalence and Nature of Intra-and Inter-group Violence in an Era of Social and Demographic Change, 2000-2014 [UNITED STATES]

36698 Afrobarometer Round 6: The Quality of Democracy and Governance in Zimbabwe, 2014

36742 Afrobarometer Round 6: The Quality of Democracy and Governance in Senegal, 2014

36867 Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA]: Collateral Measures – Scales, 2000-2010

Designing Systems for the Co-Production of Public Knowledge: Considerations for National Statistical Systems

I am pleased to say that “Designing Systems for the Co-Production of Public Knowledge: Considerations for National Statistical Systems,” written with Derrick Anderson of Arizona State, is now forthcoming at Policy Design and Practice. PDP is a new journal from Taylor & Francis. Here’s the abstract:

The functions of government are increasingly complex and information-driven. However, for many developing countries, the quality of information is poor and the consequences of that information poverty are substantial. If the goal is to establish or advance effective systems of government – in terms of formulating or implementing public policies by laws or rules – we have to consider how the design process can help attain that goal through improved information, data and evidence. National statistics are problems of governance, knowledge and design. While governments are primary users of national statistical systems, national statistical capacity is jointly determined because without contributions from non-state actors there is little hope of observing accurate data that expresses important social, economic and natural phenomena in any state – but especially so in failed, transitioning or struggling states. This paper discusses several findings from research studies for those who design and implement systems that collect, disseminate and interpret government statistics. These findings are derived from the literature on the co-production of public knowledge. The growth of complex, high dimensional data, accompanied by calls for investment in “big data” technologies and methods, will change how we collect and interpret data in many countries. Yet, our most important data enterprises are built on a human infrastructure with prospects that are both limited and supported by social factors. Organizations themselves must expend resources to navigate a world in which data is growing at exponential rates. But organizations are constrained and enabled by broader aspects of society that go well beyond government’s role in collecting, processing, and disseminating statistical data. As we discuss, one notable example is the relative presence of general purpose information technologies.

Please contact me or Derrick if you’d like a prepublication copy.

The end of PSLF?

From The Hill:

A bill from House Republicans would end a program that forgives student loans for graduates who enter public service, The Wall Street Journal reported Monday.

The GOP bill to reauthorize the Higher Education Act, introduced by Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) on Friday, would eliminate the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program, which erases student debt for those who work for qualifying employers after making payments for 10 years.

The qualifying employers include government organizations and nonprofits, according to the federal student aid website. Those who volunteer for the Peace Corps or AmeriCorps are also eligible.

The Department of Education proposed eliminating the debt forgiveness program in its budget earlier this year.
Education Secretary Betsy DeVos has overseen the elimination or rescinding of several guidances or programs within her department.

The department has also reportedly considered ending other policies that would eliminate debt forgiveness, including an Obama administration rule that erased the debt of students defrauded by predatory for-profit programs.

Data for dissertations

36874 Eurobarometer 86.1: Parlemeter 2016, Future of Europe, Media Pluralism and Democracy

36952 Millennium Cohort Study

36107 Lone Wolf Terrorism in America: Using Knowledge of Radicalization Pathways to Forge Prevention Strategies, 1940-2013

36639 Multi-site Family Study on Incarceration, Parenting and Partnering, 2008-2014 [5 States]

36650 Afrobarometer Round 6: The Quality of Democracy and Governance in Botswana, 2014

36797 General Social Survey, 1972-2016 [Cumulative File]

36815 Newly Licensed Registered Nurse Survey, 2013

36816 Newly Licensed Registered Nurse Survey, 2015

36833 Community College Civic Outcomes Survey, Spring 2015

36955 State of Michigan: Taking Action on Flint Water Test Results, 2015-2017

More examples of nudges in the public sector

Here’s an interesting story about the UK’s Behavioural Insights Team. With some useful examples that might make for interesting classroom cases/exercises:

As an example, Moore pointed to a program in Lexington, Ky., where there were 7,000 overdue water bills that totaled about $4 million. A nudge in this situation meant sending a mailer alerting people to their delinquency. Some of them included handwritten notes addressing recipients by name. In less than a month, the campaign resulted in the reconciliation of $139,000 in unpaid bills.

Santiago Garces, chief innovation officer of South Bend, Ind., described BIT’s work in his city as “wizardry.” Using mapping, South Bend found that homeowners in low income areas were less likely to take advantage of mortgage-related tax exemptions they were entitled to. This is, in many ways, what behavioral influence looks like at its best: A hard data study upends a presumption (in this case, that lower income families would be most likely to pursue tax breaks) and city government subsequently works to nudge a behavioral change for the good of its residents.

Nudges aren’t limited to exerting public influence. Andres Lazo, director of citizen-centered design for Gainesville, Fla., said he was working to use the idea internally, a strategy Moore had seen deployed elsewhere to encourage employees to share efficiency ideas by offering incentives like recognition and prizes.